• +91-9899446444
  • abhinav.kalra@arvindkalra.in
  • G-15, Sector 3, Noida

Latest case reported:
Super shine services
Arguing counsel- Abhinav Kalra
Held- Imposition of reduced penalty by AO indicates that there was actually no suppression in the case.
Demand of 6.81 crore set aside. SCN and order unsustainable.
Cestat- allahabad

Revised Due Dates to File GST Returns-Latest

Case Study-----

Assotech Ltd v. Meeruti | Judgement | Law | Casemine

Latest landmark case reported in matter of 
Assotech Ltd

Arguing counsel- Abhinav Kalra

Activity of spreading and dumping of mud on land for commercial complex not taxable if appellant unaware of subsequent land use change.
Demand dropped-6 crore approx

Lord Krishna Real Infra Private Limited v. Noida | Cestat | Judgement | Law | Casemine

Case Study---

Latest Reported case of Lord Krishna Real Infra, Noida

Arguing counsel- Abhinav Kalra

Vital aspects of framing of charges have been missing in the present case. The charges in the show cause notice have to be on the basis of books of account and records maintained by the assesses and other admissible evidences. Order set aside and demand of 8 crore with equal penalty dropped.

East India Technologies (P) Ltd. v. CC & CE

Reported case: Allahabad tribunal (East India Technology)

Arguing counsel- Abhinav Kalra

Price of warranty repairs included in sale price of TV Sets, hence, Service Tax not imposable on maintenance service. 

26364 Times Visited